Monday, February 7, 2011
Interesting Posts, Thoughts - politics, iPad, Android, Aliens
Sunday, February 6, 2011
iPhone Verus iPad Touch (With iSpot or a MiFi) Update - Mobile Platforms Need To Free Themselves of Traditional Phone Services
I had a full weekend. Dinners, coffees, trips to visit friends. And it was my iPod touch with my Clear iSpot versus everyone else who had regular cell phones, Android device or two, and a bunch of iPhones. How did that go?
Before I get into that, I want to say that I am very tempted to pull the trigger on the Verizon iPhone in the coming week. I have said that my wireless combo of iPod touch and iSpot was how I want to go from now on. And while it works very well for me, it isn't working too well for some friends and families.
I had an okay day on Saturday when I met up with friends for lunch. It was like the old days. We set up a place and time a day before. And we met on Saturday as it was supposed to be. And it worked out. There was no opportunities for anyone else to try to call just before we were supposed to meet up and change the venue or the meeting time. Personally, I found that to be annoying. And since no one could call me because I was on the way had really had no way to reach me. Just imagine driving on the freeways across LA in all that traffic and having to change and turn around or something.
Of course, if there was a need, they could still text or call me Google number to leave a message and with the iSpot, I would still be able to receive e-mails. But I think the risk of me not receiving it was just too big of a risk. And going forward, I think that would be the case.
Obviously, I was still connected. I was at Starbucks just before lunch and I was connected to the wifi there. And obviously, the iSpot provided WiMax connection.
Dinner went okay. There was just too many moving pieces and the schedule was set up a couple weeks ago.
However, this morning, it was a lot more difficult. I met up with some close family friends for dim sum. When I got there, there was a couple of hundred people ahead of us. And waiting in line was crazy. I was the first one there so I signed in for a table. And I texted my friends that I had already gotten a number and they could take their time. Meanwhile, they called me and left a voicemail telling me that they were going to be late.
Then I called them back via Skype but that went to their voicemail. Then then they called back and it went to my Google voicemail once again.
Finally, when our table became available, they had arrived.
I supposed in some circumstances, having a phone would have been more convenient.
Right now, I am waiting for a comprehensive VOIP solution. And not just any VOIP app but a service built exclusively with mobile features in mind.
Whether it's Apple, Google, or Microsoft, I like to see more more robust VOIP features built into the OS. For Google, I like to see them open up Google Voice for developers to build into their apps. This goes the same for Skype as well. As for mobile platforms, it's time to take the next step and unleash the users from traditional phone services and really take communications mobile.
Saturday, February 5, 2011
AT&T & Verizon Duels Over Who Has The Better IPhone, Apple Getting Lots Of Love
Meanwhile, ATT and Verizon Wireless (VWZ) crossed swords on Twitter and in the press over who has the better iPhone. And this week, that skirmish spilled over into television and online as they released opposing commercials that highlight who's got the better iPhone and what features one has over the other.
The best thing about this is that mobile warriors like you and me win with this kind of competition.
More at Greenjava.
Siri: Will We See Voice/Speech Integration in iOS 5?
I use Apple's Siri app on occasion. And it's a decent app for process that pulls information from various sources. However, I wonder if Apple will finally do more with it in iOS 5. After all, spending $200 million to buy it out must really mean that there is value in the app and the talent behind its development that the top echelon at Apple saw.
It is a very useful app as it is if you have never used it. It's a voice query app and I have spend some time here and there to see what I can do with it.
First, you can tap and say what you want to ask. If the question is within reason, like "where am I?", Siri thinks for a bit and offers you what it thinks is the best answer. When I asked it where my current location was, it showed me a map of where I am.
And for lunch, I was able to ask Siri where is the location to the restaurant I'm suppose to meet up with my friends. It was a very easy process. No typing required.
That's great, right? But I want to see voice input/command more tightly integrated into iOS 5. After all, the ability to do this is developing quite nicely on Android. I am certain Apple can offer similar services for its core OS.
The only thing I can think of why Apple has not do so is because it plans on doing voice in that unique Apple way that will amaze us. But time is short. Apple risk falling further behind Google which has invested much resources in this direction.
One issue that I see Apple working on is just how the artificial intelligence, for a lack of a better term, can react to the user. Sure, I am sure Apple can implement the ability for the user to speak into his or her iOS device and have a SMS or e-mail typed up and sent. Or even search for answers as we can now on Siri in a more integrated manner.
But for Apple, that is merely doing what Android can already do. No one would be impressed with that. It must go beyond that. I believe Apple will attempt to create an "understanding" between the iOS and the user.
- Learn from the user's disposition.
- Learn the user's speech and accent.
- Provide this service beyond just English or Spanish. Chinese voice/speech integration is likely something Apple is working hard on as Mandarin is quickly become one of the most important language in education and commerce.
- Ease of use will be an issue. With Android, you will have to activate speech commands. I wonder if Apple will find a way to make the process more seamless. Using Siri requires the user to launch the app. It isn't different from how we would use any other app but Apple will need to make much more natural. I don't know how. For instance, after speaking to Siri, the user has to tap the screen to let Siri know that the question has been completed.
- Apple has to make speech/voice usage more natural and common.
- Apple has to make it so that people will want to use it.
As you can see, Apple has a lot of work and perhaps, there isn't enough time between acquiring Siri, adding new features, and eventually integrating it into iOS.
For general uses, Siri is adequate but beyond a certain level of understanding, Siri has difficulties understanding what I want. And if anyone can truly build a digital companion that provide answers to queries of users in an effortless way, it'll be Apple.
Friday, February 4, 2011
New Verizon Commerical: Yes, I Can Hear You Now
Seriously though, I don't think Apple has never allowed AT&T to use the iPhone in any commercial at all. If true, this is Apple's payback to AT&T for maintaining such a crappy network all these year.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPod touch
Thursday, February 3, 2011
CDMA iPhones Sold-Out!
Simultaneous Data and Voice Is Overrated For Most Mobile Warriors - For Now
Signing Into iCloud On iPhone Helps Get Around One iCloud Account Per Device Limitation
I have more than one iCloud accounts where I keep personal data separate from other more public facing data (blogs and other writings, codin...
-
Apple intelligence will not be coming to the Apple Watch just as it will not be coming to the Apple Vision Pro. That is not only the word on...
-
We can walk and chew gum at the same time. But how about watching a video while doing yard work, during a meeting you don’t want to be at, ...
-
I used generative AI this week to find the dimensions of a refrigerator based on the model number. I googled first because of muscle memory ...