For folks who use Palms and Blackberries for work, you might be familiar with the app. Quickoffice's arrival couldn't have come at a better time as more and more businesses are opening up to the idea of adopting the iPhone into their rank of tech gears. How does it stack up?
When I first heard about Quickoffice, I was puzzled why they didn't simply wait until iPhone 3.0 is out so that it can take advantage of the new features. Regardless, it is out and WSJ's post on the app has allowed me to save $20 until a more robust version is out. So, what did WSJ's reviewer like or dislike about it?
- Liked the cut-and-paste. However, this isn't iPhone 3.0's implementation.
- Able to save files locally. Able to retreive or send files from a PC, Mac, or online storage.
- Has an e-mailing function.
- Unable to open attachments from Mail. An OS limitation. Not Quickoffice's fault.
- No spell check.
- No autocorrection.
- Landscape editing limited to word processor.
- Unable to happen Microsoft's newer file format.
Source: WSJ
Note: Speaking of the Wall Street Journal, there is also a WSJ app in the iTunes App Store. It's free to download and you have full access to the paper. Free for now. Reportedly, RM isn't happy with that so access to WSJ may not be free for much longer.
No comments:
Post a Comment