Check out Motorola's Superbowl XOOM commercial.
It's digging at Apple by referring to the 1984 ad.
Awesome! I love competition!!!
It's time for the tablet way to begin. We saw a bit of that when Samsung Tab and other Android tablets took on 25% of the tablet market. Let's be clear. It isn't as if it was stealing from Apple as the iPad sales racked up over 7 million iPads and billions in sales.
The market is wide wide open for newcomers as well as current players, Apple and Microsoft. Yeah, I'm including Microsoft in all this. And it makes sense.
The tablet war will soon be joined by the one-two punch of HP and Web OS as well as RIM and its hopes in Playbook.
There's going to be a lot of trash talking in the coming days. Apple had 95% of a market that no one knows anything about. This is a war that will last years if not decades. I am looking for Google to be a strong player with Apple fighting and biting to retain the top position.
What I see is a dark horse coming along and disrupt things along the way. I don't know who but pay attention folks, it's game on. And this Motorola commercial on Superbowl Sunday is just the start.
More at Android Guys.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPod touch
Monday, January 31, 2011
Sunday, January 30, 2011
AT&T's "4G" Network Is Nothing To Write Home About
I inherited Mom's 3G iPad last week as she waits for iPad 2 with the better resolution and frontal camera so that she can conduct video chats for work and with friends. I have been using a Wi-Fi only version and more recently, bought an. iSpot for use with it to get the wireless Internet access.
And while ATT prides itself on having the fastest 3G network in the United States, I cannot be sure if that means much. And here is why.
In one day's use and based on past experiences with ATT in the past and with T-Mobile's own network and now Clearwire's WiMax service, I am in a good position to pass a long a few conclusions.
Today, WiMax is excellent if you can get it. It is wicked fast. I consistently get about 4.5 Mbps. When T-Mobile turned on their HPSA+ network last year, I went from about 1MBps on the Android G1 to about 3 Mbps. And my understanding is that things have vastly improved by quite a bit. We could be looking at speeds up to 20 Mbps by the end of 2011.
These two current scores are in contrast with an average of 2 Mbps that I am getting on the 3G iPad. There was about three bars.
However, all the speed on the world means nothing if you can't good signals. And while I might be able to see a couple of bars, I can't say that I am happy with the 3G speed from AT&T. On the iPad, I am still unable to get anything close to the WiFi signal through the iSpot or the G1 acting as a MiFI versus just the 3G on Ma Bell.
I still don't understand why that is the case. This is something that I'll probably need to get Dave the Mobile Warrior to chime in on this.
And this is a huge deal going forward. Presumably, the next iPad may have native wireless access to Verizon's CDMA network along side AT&T. Unless it is able to somehow shorten the latency time or flip a switch to boost signal, it will not matter if users cannot access AT&T's HSPA+ speed running 14-21 Mbps while the slower CDMA networking running 1-2 Mbps is accessible by users on the same area.
Trust me, Verizon will be going after potential iPhone switchers from AT&T. A side-by-side comparison of signal strength could be just what Verizon is eagerly waiting for.
-- Post From My iPad
And while ATT prides itself on having the fastest 3G network in the United States, I cannot be sure if that means much. And here is why.
In one day's use and based on past experiences with ATT in the past and with T-Mobile's own network and now Clearwire's WiMax service, I am in a good position to pass a long a few conclusions.
Today, WiMax is excellent if you can get it. It is wicked fast. I consistently get about 4.5 Mbps. When T-Mobile turned on their HPSA+ network last year, I went from about 1MBps on the Android G1 to about 3 Mbps. And my understanding is that things have vastly improved by quite a bit. We could be looking at speeds up to 20 Mbps by the end of 2011.
These two current scores are in contrast with an average of 2 Mbps that I am getting on the 3G iPad. There was about three bars.
However, all the speed on the world means nothing if you can't good signals. And while I might be able to see a couple of bars, I can't say that I am happy with the 3G speed from AT&T. On the iPad, I am still unable to get anything close to the WiFi signal through the iSpot or the G1 acting as a MiFI versus just the 3G on Ma Bell.
I still don't understand why that is the case. This is something that I'll probably need to get Dave the Mobile Warrior to chime in on this.
And this is a huge deal going forward. Presumably, the next iPad may have native wireless access to Verizon's CDMA network along side AT&T. Unless it is able to somehow shorten the latency time or flip a switch to boost signal, it will not matter if users cannot access AT&T's HSPA+ speed running 14-21 Mbps while the slower CDMA networking running 1-2 Mbps is accessible by users on the same area.
Trust me, Verizon will be going after potential iPhone switchers from AT&T. A side-by-side comparison of signal strength could be just what Verizon is eagerly waiting for.
-- Post From My iPad
My First Podcast Via iPod Touch That You Won't Hear
As I prep to go out into the great Sunday morning to do some mobile work at Starbucks, I decided to talk to my iPod touch as I walked out the door. With the Apple headset with the mic and the iPod touch, I started chatting away. My first attempt at a podcast.
Earlier in the week, I brought up the possibility of using the Voice Memo app on the iPod touch to podcast on the go. So, how did it go?
Well, it was a grand success. I got clear voice signal and I was definitely not going for the clarity of an indoor professional recording environment. I got the background noise that I wanted with the more natural conversational tone.
But you're not going to hear it ever. The reason isn't the sound quality, rather it is the content quality. I was woefully unprepared. I chatted away on subjects of the President's State of the Union address to the nation to how I hope the recording works out the way I hoped.
In all, it was a successful ramble. Nothing more.
The reason for doing this is because it is an ongoing attempt of this blog to maximize mobile use of mobile Apple gears for productivity. And so far, I don't know of a podcast that utilizes the iOS to create podcasts.
I am encouraged and, hopefully, with more preparation and practice, I will be able to add a new dimension to my blogs.
-- Post From My iPad
Earlier in the week, I brought up the possibility of using the Voice Memo app on the iPod touch to podcast on the go. So, how did it go?
Well, it was a grand success. I got clear voice signal and I was definitely not going for the clarity of an indoor professional recording environment. I got the background noise that I wanted with the more natural conversational tone.
But you're not going to hear it ever. The reason isn't the sound quality, rather it is the content quality. I was woefully unprepared. I chatted away on subjects of the President's State of the Union address to the nation to how I hope the recording works out the way I hoped.
In all, it was a successful ramble. Nothing more.
The reason for doing this is because it is an ongoing attempt of this blog to maximize mobile use of mobile Apple gears for productivity. And so far, I don't know of a podcast that utilizes the iOS to create podcasts.
I am encouraged and, hopefully, with more preparation and practice, I will be able to add a new dimension to my blogs.
-- Post From My iPad
Apple To Ship 300 Million iOS Devices A Year? Let Do The Math
According to a report out of Korea Times, Apple and Samsung has signed a deal for the Korean tech giant to quadruple its chip shipments to Apple in the coming years.
The article specifically mentioned AP, application processors, which is just a fancy way of call the CPU inside the iOS mobile devices.
So, quadruple? Yeah looks like. Though it is possible that this is a misinterpretation and that it actually meant that Apple and Samsung signed a four year deal for Samsung Sung to supply Apple with APs.
Let's suppose that this article is correct with its facts and we really have no reason to believe that it's not, Apple will soon ship up to 4X the number of iOS devices! If we loosely take the number of iOS devices shipped in 2010 (which I estimates to be 80 million devices) and multiply it by four times, we are talking about 300 million devices a year.
Furthermore, the post suggested that Apple's business will take up 50% of Samsung's chip making capability, an increase of 20,000 sheets from 5,000 out of a capacity of 40,000 sheets.
I really hate to doubt these numbers but we cannot dispute the $3.9 billion in investments that Apple put forth for future parts for the iOS devices. Securing screens and APs seems like a prudent thing for Apple to do with the $60+ billions in cash. Maybe this was to help finance fabs for the AP and factories to crank out screens.
According to Apple, it could have sold more iPhones over the Christmas quarter had they been able to sell enough of it. Also keep in mind that Apple will start selling a CDMA version of the iPhone in a few days. And after that, these CDMA iPhones may well make their way to China, Japan, India, and Korea.
So would the other members of the iOS family. Many Apple may be gearing up for a major iOS assault on the mobile and tablet market unlike any on the previous years.
More at Korea Times,
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPod touch
The article specifically mentioned AP, application processors, which is just a fancy way of call the CPU inside the iOS mobile devices.
So, quadruple? Yeah looks like. Though it is possible that this is a misinterpretation and that it actually meant that Apple and Samsung signed a four year deal for Samsung Sung to supply Apple with APs.
Let's suppose that this article is correct with its facts and we really have no reason to believe that it's not, Apple will soon ship up to 4X the number of iOS devices! If we loosely take the number of iOS devices shipped in 2010 (which I estimates to be 80 million devices) and multiply it by four times, we are talking about 300 million devices a year.
Furthermore, the post suggested that Apple's business will take up 50% of Samsung's chip making capability, an increase of 20,000 sheets from 5,000 out of a capacity of 40,000 sheets.
I really hate to doubt these numbers but we cannot dispute the $3.9 billion in investments that Apple put forth for future parts for the iOS devices. Securing screens and APs seems like a prudent thing for Apple to do with the $60+ billions in cash. Maybe this was to help finance fabs for the AP and factories to crank out screens.
According to Apple, it could have sold more iPhones over the Christmas quarter had they been able to sell enough of it. Also keep in mind that Apple will start selling a CDMA version of the iPhone in a few days. And after that, these CDMA iPhones may well make their way to China, Japan, India, and Korea.
So would the other members of the iOS family. Many Apple may be gearing up for a major iOS assault on the mobile and tablet market unlike any on the previous years.
More at Korea Times,
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPod touch
Friday, January 28, 2011
Verizon iPhone Might Be In Short Supply, So Move Fast
Can you believe it has been almost three weeks since Apple and Verizon Wireless (VZW) announced the availability of the iPhone on America's largest (maybe second largest - VZW is disputing reports in the media that AT&T is now number one) wireless carrier and on its CDMA network.
And we are less than a week from current VZW customers getting first crack at ordering it. And the week after that, it'll be the general public's turn.
And while I am trying to stay strong and wait a bit longer, I wonder if Apple and VZW are underestimating the demands.
So far, all the folks I have spoken to are very excited about the iPhone on VZW and seemed ready to pull the trigger on it. And all surveys back in late 2010 as well as recent blog polls suggests an iPhone rout in the mobile market.
Not convinced? Let's take both Ma Bell and VZW's earrings this week. Both reported less new subscribers than Wall Street estimated. The conventional wisdom for this is that many mobile warriors held back purchases or upgrades, despite being the Holidays, and waited on faith, because we didn't know if the iPhone really was coming to VZW, that they can get the iPhone on VZW.
So the pended up demands is there. While we don't know just how much, I think we can safely say that there are going to be long lines again.
This time, however, the lines will all be outside the Apple stores and VZW stores. AT&T guys can just take it easy. At least, until June.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPod touch
And we are less than a week from current VZW customers getting first crack at ordering it. And the week after that, it'll be the general public's turn.
And while I am trying to stay strong and wait a bit longer, I wonder if Apple and VZW are underestimating the demands.
So far, all the folks I have spoken to are very excited about the iPhone on VZW and seemed ready to pull the trigger on it. And all surveys back in late 2010 as well as recent blog polls suggests an iPhone rout in the mobile market.
Not convinced? Let's take both Ma Bell and VZW's earrings this week. Both reported less new subscribers than Wall Street estimated. The conventional wisdom for this is that many mobile warriors held back purchases or upgrades, despite being the Holidays, and waited on faith, because we didn't know if the iPhone really was coming to VZW, that they can get the iPhone on VZW.
So the pended up demands is there. While we don't know just how much, I think we can safely say that there are going to be long lines again.
This time, however, the lines will all be outside the Apple stores and VZW stores. AT&T guys can just take it easy. At least, until June.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPod touch
Thursday, January 27, 2011
Podcasting With The iOS Devices
I once tried to recording a meeting I had with a couple of people (yes, I had their permissions) using the Android G1 and it did not come out well at all. So I tried it with an iPhone using the Voice Memos app and the quality was excellent.
Obviously, it was not to the level of a studio or even a semi-decent environment set up do record podcasts but it was workable.
So I did a test podcast with a friend at a coffee shop where you could hear the background noises.
To my surprise, our voices came out pretty clear. So I was considering doing a podcast on tech, both mobile and green tech, and on current events with social impacts.
I am still in the formulation stages but I am seriously considering doing this via iOS or other mobile devices only.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPod touch
Obviously, it was not to the level of a studio or even a semi-decent environment set up do record podcasts but it was workable.
So I did a test podcast with a friend at a coffee shop where you could hear the background noises.
To my surprise, our voices came out pretty clear. So I was considering doing a podcast on tech, both mobile and green tech, and on current events with social impacts.
I am still in the formulation stages but I am seriously considering doing this via iOS or other mobile devices only.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPod touch
Should Apple Release A 4" iPhone?
Should Apple release an iPhone with a 4" screen?
The 3.5" isn't all that much bigger than the 4" that we see on some of the Android devices but you can feel the difference.
And while these 4" devices are heftier, it allows more room for folks who want to see bigger images and videos.
I think Apple should consider it. Here's why. Such a device would allow Apple to differentiate the iPhone line and provide users with more choices.
After all, Apple has only one device and that is the iPhone. By providing a 3.5" and one that is 4" to 4.5", Apple can open itself up to a greater segment of the mobile market.
We can finally have the iPhone nano.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPod touch
The 3.5" isn't all that much bigger than the 4" that we see on some of the Android devices but you can feel the difference.
And while these 4" devices are heftier, it allows more room for folks who want to see bigger images and videos.
I think Apple should consider it. Here's why. Such a device would allow Apple to differentiate the iPhone line and provide users with more choices.
After all, Apple has only one device and that is the iPhone. By providing a 3.5" and one that is 4" to 4.5", Apple can open itself up to a greater segment of the mobile market.
We can finally have the iPhone nano.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPod touch
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Signing Into iCloud On iPhone Helps Get Around One iCloud Account Per Device Limitation
I have more than one iCloud accounts where I keep personal data separate from other more public facing data (blogs and other writings, codin...
-
We can walk and chew gum at the same time. But how about watching a video while doing yard work, during a meeting you don’t want to be at, ...
-
Apple intelligence will not be coming to the Apple Watch just as it will not be coming to the Apple Vision Pro. That is not only the word on...
-
I used generative AI this week to find the dimensions of a refrigerator based on the model number. I googled first because of muscle memory ...