Source: Macrumors, WSJ.
A couple of weeks ago, the big news was that Apple acquired a motion sensing company, PrimeSense (On Apple) that once made sensors for Microsoft's Kinect for the Xbox. Late today, we learned that Apple has made use of its billions with another buyout: Topsy. This one is just as significant and targeted as are other Apple buys.
According to reports, Topsy is a search (interesting) and analytical company indexes social data - like being in business with Twitter since 2006. Now, in the past, people have suggested that Apple buy Twitter. It's common sense that it would never happen. So why buy Twitter when you can buy the tweets?
Does that mean that Apple will begin spying on its own ecosystem - iOS And Mac users? Not likely. However, it's possible for Apple to push ads, apps, contents, and whatever else in its ecosystem based on user tweets or just general trends based on all the information it already has collected about its users.
Interestingly, Topsy has data on Google+ as well (Facebook not mentioned which is not a surprise). We'll see how long Google allows this given the change in Topsy management.
What is of interest from the privacy side is what Apple will be sharing, if any, with advertisers that utilize iAds and iTunes Radio. In the past, Apple has blasted, without naming Google, of how the search and ad giant collects data from Android users.
Now, let's having fun with this. Apple's very own search engine? Probably not. But it would be interesting to see just how Apple can go about creating one and how effective and accurate it can be if it ever wants to stop relying on Google, Microsoft, or anyone else.
I want to go down this unlikely road because, according to WSJ, this deal would not have gone through had Twitter not given Apple and Topsy its blessing. A search engine filled with tweets would be an effective tool against Facebook and Google for Twitter. Furthermore, it would allow better information to be collected and monetized that would be beneficial to Twitter's bottom line.
It is also possible that Apple is more interested in the technology behind Topsy. With this $200 million acquisition, Apple likely bought itself a top notch social data and search apparatus as well as some valued engineers and analysts.
Furthermore, it could beef up Siri's own database and responses to user inquiries. It'll be interest to see how Siri would utilize social data.
While I'm excited about this acquisition by Apple (most Apple acquisitions generate a great deal of attention), I am concerned about the possibility that Apple might share iOS and Mac user data with third parties.
Tuesday, December 3, 2013
Monday, December 2, 2013
Wireless: Wi-Fi Blanket in Taiwan, Whether It Can Work In the US
I'm currently in Taiwan. On vacation and visited work for a short while. During the trip so far, it's been fun. I've also suffered from food poisoning. Better now. One of the things I've noticed about Taiwan is the great mobile service. Great single and decent plans. In fact, I got a 3G sim card for my iPad. It costs about $20 a month and it's data you want. Unlimited.
And as far as I know, I have yet to encountered any throttling.
However, there is one issue that I found perplexing. Wi-Fi isn't free. I walk into a Starbucks expecting the same complimentary free Internet access in the US was no where to be found. I was met with a Chinese mention that requires a paid log-in. (I was told the local Starbucks here, and maybe elsewhere in the world, are not wholly-owned by Starbucks and are franchises.)
Then I was told that in the capital city of Taiwan, Taipei, blocks of the city is blanketed by a Wi-FI cloud. That is, in fact, free. Where I live here in a part called New Taipei, that service has not come here yet.
So, 3G but no Wi-Fi. How about the US? There are cities that have free Wi-Fi services. I'm curious to see how it works when I get a chance to go into Taipei and see just how far the service is extended.
Supposedly, there are 57 cities in the US that provide municipal Internet access (wiki). These municipal wireless networks are key to business and educational developments, and in some instances, bring Internet services to those who are unable to pay for them.
In general, I'm pretty optimistic about blanket Internet services because of how they can be used to augment cellular data networks by offloading access to other networks, taking the load off the cell towers and limited bandwidth and spectrum.
Furthermore, while it has been slow going in the White Spaces market, I'm optimistic that it will be key to the next generation of wireless access. Google has been a big proponent of White Spaces and recently opened up its database to others (Gigaom). The database will allow builders and developers to make products and services in spectrums not used by licensed users and to make sure that there are no disruption with existing services like TV signals.
More on White Spaces later as a lot has changed since we talked about this more than a year ago. Suffice to say, things are looking up in general for better and more reliable wireless access. However, a wireless utopia is still decades away.
And as far as I know, I have yet to encountered any throttling.
However, there is one issue that I found perplexing. Wi-Fi isn't free. I walk into a Starbucks expecting the same complimentary free Internet access in the US was no where to be found. I was met with a Chinese mention that requires a paid log-in. (I was told the local Starbucks here, and maybe elsewhere in the world, are not wholly-owned by Starbucks and are franchises.)
Then I was told that in the capital city of Taiwan, Taipei, blocks of the city is blanketed by a Wi-FI cloud. That is, in fact, free. Where I live here in a part called New Taipei, that service has not come here yet.
So, 3G but no Wi-Fi. How about the US? There are cities that have free Wi-Fi services. I'm curious to see how it works when I get a chance to go into Taipei and see just how far the service is extended.
Supposedly, there are 57 cities in the US that provide municipal Internet access (wiki). These municipal wireless networks are key to business and educational developments, and in some instances, bring Internet services to those who are unable to pay for them.
In general, I'm pretty optimistic about blanket Internet services because of how they can be used to augment cellular data networks by offloading access to other networks, taking the load off the cell towers and limited bandwidth and spectrum.
Furthermore, while it has been slow going in the White Spaces market, I'm optimistic that it will be key to the next generation of wireless access. Google has been a big proponent of White Spaces and recently opened up its database to others (Gigaom). The database will allow builders and developers to make products and services in spectrums not used by licensed users and to make sure that there are no disruption with existing services like TV signals.
More on White Spaces later as a lot has changed since we talked about this more than a year ago. Suffice to say, things are looking up in general for better and more reliable wireless access. However, a wireless utopia is still decades away.
Wednesday, November 20, 2013
Apple's Profit Margins and Changing Mobile Storage Needs On iOS Devices
Everyone knows that when Apple increase the GB storage on the iPad with a $100 increase does not really mean that Apple's memory cost also double. If anything, Apple is making more money when an user buys a 32 GB model of the iPad or iPhone over the 16 GB models. And users are happy to fork over to Apple $100 for the 32 GB, $200 more for the 64 GB model, and $300 more for the 128 GB version. I did with the iPad Air.
There are a couple of implications for Apple and mobile computing. Both speaks volumes about where we are headed.
First, Apple's margins should increase for this quarter. Why is this important to a blog only about state of Apple mobile? It says that Apple is skating to where the puck is going to be and not where its at now. So far, we don't see any competing devices at the 128 GB end and only a few mobile devices with 64 GB. The Surface tablets have about the same amount of storage in name as the iPads but because of the bloated state of the Windows OS, much of that storage is unable to the end users.
Second, people are willing to pay more for value. And users like myself like to be able to carry more media and apps with us when possible. Heck, I would have bought a 256 GB iPad Air had there been one.
If you check around, you'll find that people are buying into the higher storage iPads. Particularly evident is lack of 64 and 128 GB models available on a consistent basis for sale at the Apple stores and in other retailers.
And consider the whole mobile plan that Apple is cooking up, including the preemptive move to a 64-bit chip architecture with the A7 chip, it means iOS devices will be able to do more and faster with each upgrade. That would also mean that users will require more storage for media and apps.
There are a couple of implications for Apple and mobile computing. Both speaks volumes about where we are headed.
First, Apple's margins should increase for this quarter. Why is this important to a blog only about state of Apple mobile? It says that Apple is skating to where the puck is going to be and not where its at now. So far, we don't see any competing devices at the 128 GB end and only a few mobile devices with 64 GB. The Surface tablets have about the same amount of storage in name as the iPads but because of the bloated state of the Windows OS, much of that storage is unable to the end users.
Second, people are willing to pay more for value. And users like myself like to be able to carry more media and apps with us when possible. Heck, I would have bought a 256 GB iPad Air had there been one.
If you check around, you'll find that people are buying into the higher storage iPads. Particularly evident is lack of 64 and 128 GB models available on a consistent basis for sale at the Apple stores and in other retailers.
And consider the whole mobile plan that Apple is cooking up, including the preemptive move to a 64-bit chip architecture with the A7 chip, it means iOS devices will be able to do more and faster with each upgrade. That would also mean that users will require more storage for media and apps.
Sunday, November 17, 2013
Apple Bought PrimeSense, Tech Behind Microsoft's Kinect - Now, What?
Source: PrimeSense, Reuters.
Today, the Web exploded with news that Apple bought PrimeSense, the company that develops 3D sensing technology for systems including mobile. And it happens to be the company behind Microsoft's Xbox Kinect.
So, what happens now and when will see something come to fruition from this buyout?
Look beyond just the Xbox at who PrimeSense's partners are and you see why Apple showed interest in the company and decide to bring it into the fold.
Today, the Web exploded with news that Apple bought PrimeSense, the company that develops 3D sensing technology for systems including mobile. And it happens to be the company behind Microsoft's Xbox Kinect.
So, what happens now and when will see something come to fruition from this buyout?
Look beyond just the Xbox at who PrimeSense's partners are and you see why Apple showed interest in the company and decide to bring it into the fold.
- Microsoft, again.
- Robotic companies like iRobot.
- 3D scanners that could become a bigger deal with 3D printing.
- Asus with computers.
- Real world physical activities.
Only Apple knows what it will do with this new buy. It's unlikely Apple will just introduce a Kinect clone. Apple does make and released products for the sake of doing it. Apple has found an unique and identifiable use for PS technology, whether in its current line of products or new ones, that can benefit its customers.
It's likely going to be used in something Apple has in the works for some time. The integration of 3D sensing technology from PrimeSense could take some more doing. Apple probably has already gone pretty far with this. It's likely we can see something new in 2014 with this. I'm possibly being optimistic but, hey, it's Apple we're talking about here.
PS already has 3D sensors small enough to fit inside a mobile device like a phone or tablet.
iPhone With Curved Screen: How Much Sense Does It Make?
Source: On Android.
First there was the Nexus S. Now the LG Flex. Samsung also has its own device but there isn't anything new about it - if you want to know, it's called the Round. You can head over to The Verge for more info. Between the two, I think the Flex's top-bottom curve makes more sense than the Round's side-to-side curvature.
However, this is talk that Apple is interested in developing its own curved-screen iPhone. It's a rumor and while I don't like to dish rumors here, for the sake of speculation, we will here.
Let's suppose the rumors about Apple releasing a curved iPhone is true, it'll be interesting to see what real world advantages of curved screens has over traditional screens that Apple can develop. What kind of real world applications a curved iPhone might have over competing devices from the Android world.
I've mentioned that reduced glare might be a possible advantage but there would need to be more for Apple to move on it. And Apple never released a product with new technology for the sake of doing it.
Word is that special sensors could be in the works. If true, that would make the rumors, and that's all they are, rumors, make more sense.
Today on a Sunday, the mobile world exploded that Apple bought a 3D sensor company. Initial reports are that the company, PrimeSense, focused on 3D sensing for the living room as well as mobile (Reuters).
For speculation sake, let's sake Apple needs something from PrimeSense for more than the living room. Say it has to do with the curved screen design. Wouldn't that be spectacular?
First there was the Nexus S. Now the LG Flex. Samsung also has its own device but there isn't anything new about it - if you want to know, it's called the Round. You can head over to The Verge for more info. Between the two, I think the Flex's top-bottom curve makes more sense than the Round's side-to-side curvature.
However, this is talk that Apple is interested in developing its own curved-screen iPhone. It's a rumor and while I don't like to dish rumors here, for the sake of speculation, we will here.
Let's suppose the rumors about Apple releasing a curved iPhone is true, it'll be interesting to see what real world advantages of curved screens has over traditional screens that Apple can develop. What kind of real world applications a curved iPhone might have over competing devices from the Android world.
I've mentioned that reduced glare might be a possible advantage but there would need to be more for Apple to move on it. And Apple never released a product with new technology for the sake of doing it.
Word is that special sensors could be in the works. If true, that would make the rumors, and that's all they are, rumors, make more sense.
Today on a Sunday, the mobile world exploded that Apple bought a 3D sensor company. Initial reports are that the company, PrimeSense, focused on 3D sensing for the living room as well as mobile (Reuters).
For speculation sake, let's sake Apple needs something from PrimeSense for more than the living room. Say it has to do with the curved screen design. Wouldn't that be spectacular?
Must Read: Paid Firms To Stack Against Apple May Have Short Term Effect But Long Term Could Still Go Apple's Way
Here's a must read Appleinsider post regarding just how analytical firms that sell themselves to the highest bidders to stack statistics their way. What's interesting is a quote within one firm's, Strategy Analytics, client page that one of its missions is to "influencing consumer behavior and buying preferences".
Time and time again, we've noticed that firms refuse to recognize Apple's growing dominance in the tablet market with the iPad and the influence its had on the PC market. Time and time again, firms refuse to acknowledge the change in the mobile computing market in a shift away from PC towards more lighter and nimbler tablets, at the time, was only the iPad that sold in any number.
The question is does Apple mobile fans care? Probably not. Only a subset of this group really care about these reports or keep scores. For the general mobile market, those who are more educated about the differences between tablets, iPad versus others, know what they want and whether they want to be a part of Apple's iTunes, iOS, and mobile ecosystem. A wider portion of the market care nothing at all about iTunes or Play or anyone else. For them, it's about the price.
The point though is that Apple owns a large segment of the mobile market, both PC and tablet, of those willing to invest in the mobile life. This is part of the market are willing to spend more on their devices and not only download apps but buy apps as well. This is why though Google's Android has overtaken Apple in terms of downloads but Apple is still king when it comes to app store monetization. This is why Apple likes to brag about how much Apple has paid out to developers.
And while the public may not know or care in general, constantly hearing how Mac sales are slowing or that Android tablet shipments have outran the iPad could definitely have an adverse influence on Apple.
It's possible that the tide could turn in market and profit share against Apple. But I think any setback is temporary. Just like in the smartphone market, the iPhone has had to deal with $100 or $200 Android devices (and now, cheap Windows Phones too) for years since its introduction in 2007. But in the US market now, sales of iPhone is beginning to turn around and in about a year, could overtake Android.
Note that Appleinsider is a rumor site and very pro-Apple. I have found that while it is pro-Apple, it isn't in the realm of Fox News if you get what I mean. It's very insightful and doesn't go places or twist facts too much to make its argument. Still, you have to decide for yourself about this particular post.
Time and time again, we've noticed that firms refuse to recognize Apple's growing dominance in the tablet market with the iPad and the influence its had on the PC market. Time and time again, firms refuse to acknowledge the change in the mobile computing market in a shift away from PC towards more lighter and nimbler tablets, at the time, was only the iPad that sold in any number.
The question is does Apple mobile fans care? Probably not. Only a subset of this group really care about these reports or keep scores. For the general mobile market, those who are more educated about the differences between tablets, iPad versus others, know what they want and whether they want to be a part of Apple's iTunes, iOS, and mobile ecosystem. A wider portion of the market care nothing at all about iTunes or Play or anyone else. For them, it's about the price.
The point though is that Apple owns a large segment of the mobile market, both PC and tablet, of those willing to invest in the mobile life. This is part of the market are willing to spend more on their devices and not only download apps but buy apps as well. This is why though Google's Android has overtaken Apple in terms of downloads but Apple is still king when it comes to app store monetization. This is why Apple likes to brag about how much Apple has paid out to developers.
And while the public may not know or care in general, constantly hearing how Mac sales are slowing or that Android tablet shipments have outran the iPad could definitely have an adverse influence on Apple.
It's possible that the tide could turn in market and profit share against Apple. But I think any setback is temporary. Just like in the smartphone market, the iPhone has had to deal with $100 or $200 Android devices (and now, cheap Windows Phones too) for years since its introduction in 2007. But in the US market now, sales of iPhone is beginning to turn around and in about a year, could overtake Android.
Note that Appleinsider is a rumor site and very pro-Apple. I have found that while it is pro-Apple, it isn't in the realm of Fox News if you get what I mean. It's very insightful and doesn't go places or twist facts too much to make its argument. Still, you have to decide for yourself about this particular post.
Friday, November 15, 2013
Social: Power of A People, Social Media, And Kindness Helps Kid Battling Leukemia Save Gotham
Source: Make A Wish Foundation, Business Insider, Politico.
Great news, folks. Gotham City is once again safe. Thanks to not Batman (he had a small part in it). Not one of the various Robins. Not Nightwing. Nope, not Superman either. Or the JLA. It's Batkid!!!
That's right! Thanks to Make A Wish Foundation, more than 10K fellow Americans, and thousands if not millions of us on social media cheering him on, Batkid, aka Miles, roamed through Gotham (San Francisco) to save its citizens from evildoers.
What's more, many are cheering him on via social media like Twitter. Tweets from famous folks, politicans (some of them I like Batkid to deal with, and even the President of the United States.
This has got to be one of the best stories of 2013. It's just so heart-warming to see what Americans can do even for a 5-year old when we work together.
And Miles, continue the good fight. We're all pulling and with you!
Also, never once did the Make A Wish Foundation expect their website to crash. And only the Batkid could do that!
Great news, folks. Gotham City is once again safe. Thanks to not Batman (he had a small part in it). Not one of the various Robins. Not Nightwing. Nope, not Superman either. Or the JLA. It's Batkid!!!
What's more, many are cheering him on via social media like Twitter. Tweets from famous folks, politicans (some of them I like Batkid to deal with, and even the President of the United States.
With little brother aka Robin. Choking back tears! #sfbatkid pic.twitter.com/apIpn9OUYn
— patricia wilson (@pilarwish) November 15, 2013
This has got to be one of the best stories of 2013. It's just so heart-warming to see what Americans can do even for a 5-year old when we work together.
And Miles, continue the good fight. We're all pulling and with you!
Also, never once did the Make A Wish Foundation expect their website to crash. And only the Batkid could do that!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Signing Into iCloud On iPhone Helps Get Around One iCloud Account Per Device Limitation
I have more than one iCloud accounts where I keep personal data separate from other more public facing data (blogs and other writings, codin...
-
We can walk and chew gum at the same time. But how about watching a video while doing yard work, during a meeting you don’t want to be at, ...
-
Apple intelligence will not be coming to the Apple Watch just as it will not be coming to the Apple Vision Pro. That is not only the word on...
-
I used generative AI this week to find the dimensions of a refrigerator based on the model number. I googled first because of muscle memory ...